Oracle’s 30% Spike: Cloud Megadeals, AI Capacity, and a $455B Backlog — Does the Outlook Justify the Rerating?

September 10, 2025 at 1:50 PM UTC
5 min read

Oracle rocketed after earnings despite a headline EPS and revenue miss, as investors focused on an extraordinary multiyear demand picture tied to artificial intelligence and cloud infrastructure. Remaining performance obligations surged to $455 billion, management mapped a path from roughly $10 billion of OCI revenue in FY2025 to $18 billion in FY2026 and as high as $144 billion by FY2030, and capex is set to climb about 65% to approximately $35 billion this year to build capacity. The core debate now is whether backlog quality, conversion tempo, and execution against aggressive capacity plans can sustain the stock’s rerating in the face of power, supply, and competitive constraints.

Watch: Oracle’s 30% Spike: Cloud Megadeals, AI Capacity, and a $455B Backlog — Does the Outlook Justify the Rerating?

🎬 Watch the Video Version

Get the full analysis in our comprehensive video breakdown of this article.(7 minutes)

Watch on YouTube

Oracle OCI Revenue Targets (Management Outlook)

Management’s multiyear OCI path from roughly $10B in FY2025 to $144B by FY2030.

Source: Company guidance via earnings commentary • As of 2025-09-10

What Drove the Rally: Backlog, Cloud Targets, and Capacity

The quarter’s reported numbers were not the headline: adjusted EPS came in at $1.47 versus $1.48 expected, and revenue was $14.93 billion versus $15.04 billion consensus. Revenue still grew 12% year over year, with net income roughly flat at $2.93 billion. The market instead zeroed in on what comes next.

OCI is the center of gravity. Cloud infrastructure revenue rose 55% year over year to $3.3 billion, and management outlined a multiyear ramp from about $10 billion in FY2025 to $18 billion in FY2026 (roughly 77% growth), then $32 billion, $73 billion, $114 billion, and $144 billion over the subsequent four fiscal years. The sheer scale of the demand signal was reinforced by RPO jumping to $455 billion (up 359% year over year), a contracted backlog that will recognize over time as capacity comes online and workloads scale.

To meet that demand, Oracle plans approximately $35 billion in capex this fiscal year, about 65% higher, prioritizing technology, networks, and GPUs over owning data center real estate. That approach is intended to accelerate time-to-capacity while limiting balance-sheet exposure to buildings and land—though it still relies on navigating chip supply, grid interconnections, and permitting timelines.

Why Wall Street Was ‘Slack-Jawed’

Analysts described the outlook as staggering: four multibillion-dollar contracts with three customers signed in the quarter, OpenAI’s agreement to develop 4.5 gigawatts of U.S. data center capacity with Oracle, and a multiyear OCI revenue glidepath that implies an order-of-magnitude step-up. Oracle also provided near-term anchors, guiding fiscal Q2 adjusted EPS to $1.61–$1.65 with 14%–16% revenue growth, effectively setting execution checkpoints for the coming quarter.

The reaction: price target increases proliferated, though sell-side averages still lag the speed of the move. Recent aggregated targets averaged in the high-$200s, below the stock’s post-guidance surge, underscoring how quickly investor expectations have reset.

Oracle Shares: Last 10 Trading Days

Post-guidance spike shows a step-change in valuation.

Source: Yahoo Finance (ORCL) • As of 2025-09-10

Q1 FY2026 Snapshot vs Consensus

Key reported figures and year-over-year growth.

MetricReportedConsensusYoY
Adjusted EPS$1.47$1.48
Revenue$14.93B$15.04B+12%
Net Income$2.93BFlat

Source: Company results; CNBC earnings coverage

Real Demand or Hyperscaler Capacity Offload?

A central question is demand composition. Some of the activity may reflect hyperscalers offloading capacity during a supply/power-constrained buildout, steering workloads to Oracle when their own GPU or site readiness is tight. That demand is real, but its durability, pricing, and stickiness may differ from organically won workloads.

For context, Google Cloud disclosed a $106 billion backlog growing faster than revenue, with more than half expected to convert within two years—illustrating how AI-era commitments phase in over time as capacity and use cases mature. For Oracle, the key will be conversion velocity and breadth: translating megadeals into high-utilization workloads with improving unit economics while broadening adoption beyond a handful of marquee AI customers. Monitoring customer concentration, offload persistence, and OCI growth cadence will be essential.

Backlog and Targets: Oracle vs Google Cloud

Backlog scale and conversion context across major cloud providers.

ProviderBacklog / RPOConversion Guide (2Y)Notes
Oracle (OCI)$455B RPOUndisclosedIncludes multi-year megadeals; conversion tied to capacity delivery
Google Cloud$106B backlog>50% expectedBacklog growing faster than revenue

Source: Company disclosures; executive remarks reported by financial media

Signals from the Supply Chain: The AI Infrastructure Supercycle

Supply-chain signals corroborate sustained AI infrastructure demand. Broadcom announced a new $10 billion custom AI chip customer, widely linked by analysts to OpenAI, with shipments expected to begin in 2026. The commitment sits alongside rising orders from existing web-scale customers and supports a multiyear buildout arc spanning silicon, optical interconnects, power, and cooling.

Oracle’s positioning hinges on access to advanced GPUs and strategic partnerships—from enabling Google’s Gemini on OCI to an Oracle AI Database service that aims to run models like OpenAI’s directly on enterprise data resident in Oracle databases. These integrations are designed to reduce friction between data gravity and AI execution, potentially accelerating backlog conversion.

Power is the emerging bottleneck. U.S. electricity generation remained seasonally elevated in 2025—roughly 401 TWh in January and 393 TWh in June—reflecting grid loads that can affect data center deployments. Even with an asset-light real estate approach, power sourcing and interconnection queues are critical-path items for capacity timing.

U.S. Electricity Generation in 2025 (TWh, monthly)

Elevated power demand underscores grid constraints relevant to AI data center buildouts.

Source: EIA monthly electricity generation (Form EIA-923) • As of 2025-08

Capital Intensity, Risks, and Execution Hurdles

Capex efficiency and utilization will determine returns. Oracle ended FY2025 with operating cash flow of about $20.8 billion and free cash flow modestly negative as investment accelerated—typical when capacity is added ahead of revenue recognition. Margins often lag during ramp and improve as utilization rises and software/service attach increases.

Liquidity and leverage require attention. Recent filings show a current ratio below 1 and elevated leverage alongside strong ROE, consistent with an aggressive buildout posture. Execution risks span chip availability, supply chain timing, grid interconnections, and permitting. Competitive intensity remains high as Oracle scales against incumbents with entrenched enterprise footprints. Customer concentration adds sensitivity to spending arcs from a few AI leaders.

Pricing risk is two-sided: scarcity can support pricing near term, but if supply catches up unevenly, localized price pressure can appear. The asset strategy—own the tech stack and networks, not the buildings—may speed capacity and focus capital on higher-return layers, but it doesn’t eliminate external dependencies.

Capex and Cash Flow

Investment ramp and cash generation context.

ItemFY2025FY2026 (Guide)YoY Change
Capital Expenditures$21.22B~$35B+~65%
Operating Cash Flow$20.82B
Free Cash Flow-$0.39B

Source: SEC filings (cash flow statements); Company guidance

Valuation and a Scenario Framework

With long rates elevated and policy rates projected to ease gradually, valuation hinges on conversion credibility and cash flow trajectories. The 10-year Treasury is near 4.1% and the 30-year around 4.7%, keeping discount rates above the pre-2022 regime. FOMC projections point to a lower policy rate path over the next two years, which could modestly ease the cost-of-capital headwind if realized.

Base case: steady OCI conversion, balanced capex pacing, and rising utilization support continued top-line acceleration and gradual gross margin expansion. Bull case: faster RPO monetization, sustained megadeal momentum, favorable mix/pricing, and efficient capital deployment compress the catch-up period to hyperscale leaders. Bear case: capacity delays, slower conversion, offload fading, and pricing pressure weigh on margins amid elevated power and build costs.

Key watch items: quarterly OCI growth cadence and mix; gross margin progression as new capacity fills; capex efficiency and timing versus plan; customer concentration and retention; and RPO conversion pace and quality. Macro variables—rates, power availability, and regulatory timelines—remain direct inputs to execution and valuation.

Market Backdrop Dashboard

Spot equity, long rates, and policy rate outlook help frame valuation context.

Source: Yahoo Finance; U.S. Treasury; Federal Reserve SEP • As of 2025-09-10

📊
ORCL Price
336.55USD
Sep 10, 2025
Source: Yahoo Finance
📊
10Y Treasury
4.08%
Sep 9, 2025
Source: U.S. Treasury
📊
30Y Treasury
4.72%
Sep 9, 2025
Source: U.S. Treasury
🏦
Fed Funds (Median, 2025)
3.60%
Jun 2025 SEP
Source: Federal Reserve
📋Market Backdrop Dashboard

Spot equity, long rates, and policy rate outlook help frame valuation context.

Conclusion

Oracle’s case for a higher multiple rests on unprecedented backlog, visible multiyear cloud targets, and AI-driven demand that’s showing up across customers and the supply chain. The company’s capacity plan and partnerships are designed to translate commitments into revenue at scale. The flip side is that expectations have been pulled forward. Conversion timing, capital intensity, power constraints, and competitive responses inject execution risk, particularly with concentration in a few mega-customers. This remains a multiyear, execution-heavy story. If Oracle delivers against its guide and maintains cost-performance and model-integration advantages, the rerating can hold; if not, volatility is likely as each quarter tests the thesis.

🤖

AI-Assisted Analysis with Human Editorial Review

This article combines AI-generated analysis with human editorial oversight. While artificial intelligence creates initial drafts using real-time data and various sources, all published content has been reviewed, fact-checked, and edited by human editors.

⚠️

Important Financial Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Consult with qualified financial professionals before making investment decisions. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

⚖️

Legal Disclaimer

This AI-assisted content with human editorial review is provided for informational purposes only. The publisher is not liable for decisions made based on this information. Always conduct independent research and consult qualified professionals before making any decisions based on this content.

This analysis combines AI-generated insights with human editorial review using real-time data from authoritative sources

View More Analysis
Oracle’s 30% Spike: Cloud Megadeals, AI Capacity, and a $455B Backlog — Does the Outlook Justify the Rerating? | MacroSpire